Serve open models cheaply and DeepInfra wins; need tuned throughput, managed training, and procurement-grade compliance and you pay the Fireworks premium. Fireworks built a custom inference stack (FireAttention CUDA kernels, FireOptimizer, speculative decoding) and prices for performance and enterprise compliance. DeepInfra strips the stack down to the cheapest serverless tokens it can ship, plus dedicated H100s at a fraction of Fireworks' on-demand GPU rate.
The headline split: Fireworks charges $0.90 per million tokens for Llama 3.1 70B and $7.00/hr for an on-demand H100. DeepInfra charges $0.40 per million for the same model and $1.79/hr for a dedicated H100. Fireworks wins on tuned latency and compliance breadth. DeepInfra wins on raw cost, runs 190+ models on one OpenAI-compatible API, and expects you to bring your own checkpoint.
All numbers are as of early-to-mid 2026.
TL;DR
- Pick Fireworks AI if you need tuned low latency, managed fine-tuning (LoRA, DPO, reinforcement fine-tuning up to 1T+ params), and the broadest compliance suite (SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO). FireAttention kernels and FireOptimizer are the differentiators.
- Pick DeepInfra if cost is the priority. Llama 70B at $0.40/M, dedicated H100 at $1.79/hr, A100 at $0.89/hr, and 190+ open models on one OpenAI-compatible API, with your own checkpoint.
Who Wins Per Workload
The verdict is rarely "one is better." It splits by what you are serving and how steadily.
| Workload / decision | Fireworks AI | DeepInfra |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest at scale | DeepInfra ($0.40/M, 2.25x less) | Winner |
| Cheapest dedicated GPU | DeepInfra ($1.79 vs $7/hr H100) | Winner |
| Lowest tail latency | Winner (FireAttention kernels) | No custom kernel stack |
| Bursty / spiky traffic | Winner (per-second scale-to-zero) | Autoscaling, no scale-to-zero |
| Fine-tune & serve in one place | Winner (managed LoRA/DPO/RFT) | Bring your own checkpoint |
| Most models / modalities | Curated set | Winner (190+ models) |
| Strictest compliance (HIPAA/SOC2) | Winner (audited, signs BAA) | Confirm attestations directly |
| Hugging Face pipelines | Not an HF provider | Winner (HF Inference Provider) |
Quick Comparison
Same API shape, different priorities. The table below adds Morph as the coding-agent pick, since neither general host is built for the apply-and-search inner loop.
| Spec | Fireworks AI | DeepInfra | Morph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Tuned-latency open-model serving | Cheapest open-model serving | Coding-agent inner loop |
| Llama 3.1 70B (per 1M) | $0.90 | $0.40 | Code-specific endpoints |
| Serverless + Dedicated | Both | Both | Managed fleet |
| On-Demand H100 ($/hr) | $7.00 | $1.79 | N/A |
| Custom Inference Engine | FireAttention + FireOptimizer | Optimized H100/A100 | Code-tuned CUDA kernels |
| Code-Specific Apply | No | No | Yes (/v1/code/apply) |
| Semantic Code Search | No | No | WarpGrep |
| Apply Throughput | General token serving | General token serving | ~10,500 tok/s |
| First-Pass Apply Accuracy | N/A | N/A | 98% |
| Managed Fine-Tuning | LoRA / DPO / RFT to 1T+ | Deploy your own | N/A |
| Compliance | SOC 2 II, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO | Standard | Standard |
| Best For | Latency + fine-tuning + compliance | Lowest cost per token | Coding agents |
Pricing: DeepInfra Undercuts on Tokens
DeepInfra is the cheaper serverless option across the board. The gap is largest on mid-size models.
| Model | Fireworks AI | DeepInfra |
|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 70B | $0.90 | $0.40 in / $0.40 out |
| Llama 3.1 8B | $0.20 | $0.02 in / $0.05 out |
| Cached Input Discount | 50% | Varies by model |
| Batch Inference Discount | 50% of serverless | Not advertised |
| Embeddings (per 1M) | $0.008-$0.10 | $0.005-$0.01 |
On Llama 3.1 70B, DeepInfra at $0.40 per million is 2.25x cheaper than Fireworks at $0.90. On 8B-class models the spread is even wider. Fireworks offsets some of this with a 50% cached-input discount and a 50% batch-inference discount for high-volume offline jobs.
Where Fireworks Earns Its Premium
Fireworks charges more per token because it ships a tuned stack: FireAttention kernels, automatic speculative decoding on latency-sensitive deployments, and FireOptimizer, which adapts speculative execution to your traffic for up to 3x latency improvement. If your workload is latency-bound rather than cost-bound, that premium can pay for itself.
Cost on a Real Workload
Cost on a real workload (computed from list prices, June 2026)
Take serving Llama 3.1 70B at 50M output tokens/day, a steady production load.
- DeepInfra serverless: 50M x $0.40/M = $20/day = ~$600/mo.
- Fireworks serverless: 50M x $0.90/M = $45/day = ~$1,350/mo.
- One dedicated DeepInfra H100 at $1.79/hr = ~$1,289/mo, fixed regardless of token count.
At this volume DeepInfra serverless ($600/mo) is the cheapest option and beats even DeepInfra's own dedicated H100 ($1,289/mo). 50M output tokens/day is only ~580 tok/s averaged, well below the ~1,240 tok/s break-even where a saturated $1.79/hr H100 starts to win. Dedicated only pays off once sustained throughput climbs past that line; below it, serverless wins because you pay per token, not per idle GPU-hour. Fireworks serverless costs 2.25x DeepInfra serverless here, the price of its tuned stack and compliance.
Dedicated GPUs: A 4x Price Gap
This is the most lopsided number on the page. DeepInfra's dedicated GPU pricing is roughly a quarter of Fireworks' on-demand rate.
| GPU | Fireworks AI | DeepInfra |
|---|---|---|
| A100 80GB | Custom / on-demand tier | $0.89 |
| H100 80GB | $7.00 | $1.79 |
| H200 141GB | $7.00 | $2.19 |
| B200 180GB | $10.00 | $2.79 |
| Billing | Per second, scale to zero | Per uptime, autoscaling |
DeepInfra rents an H100 80GB at $1.79/hr versus Fireworks at $7.00/hr, and a B200 at $2.79/hr versus $10.00/hr. For steady self-hosting of your own fine-tuned model, DeepInfra is the obvious cost choice.
Fireworks bills dedicated capacity per second with auto-scale to zero, which suits bursty traffic where you do not want to pay for idle GPUs. The two pricing models answer different questions: DeepInfra for cheap sustained throughput, Fireworks for spiky workloads that need to scale down between bursts.
Neither is built for the coding-agent apply loop; if applying model-generated code edits is the bottleneck, that is a different tool (Morph Fast Apply, ~10,500 tok/s, with published benchmarks).
Inference Speed: Fireworks' Custom Stack
Fireworks wins on tuned latency. Its inference engine is the differentiator, not the model weights.
Every Fireworks model runs on FireAttention, a production engine with handwritten CUDA attention kernels. Fireworks reports up to 12x faster long-context inference with FireAttention V2 and lower latency than self-hosted vLLM. Speculative decoding is on by default for latency-sensitive deployments, and FireOptimizer tunes that speculation to your own traffic.
DeepInfra runs optimized H100 and A100 clusters with continuous batching and autoscaling, but does not market a proprietary kernel stack. In practice it delivers competitive throughput at a much lower price, while Fireworks targets the lowest tail latency. If you are latency-sensitive, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing.
Fine-Tuning: Fireworks Is the Full Platform
Fireworks is the more complete self-serve training platform. DeepInfra is the cheaper place to serve a model you already trained.
| Capability | Fireworks AI | DeepInfra |
|---|---|---|
| Managed LoRA SFT | Yes | No (deploy your own) |
| DPO Training | Yes | No |
| Reinforcement Fine-Tuning | Yes (RFT) | No |
| Max Model Size | 1T+ params | Limited by GPU tier |
| LoRA SFT Price (16-80B) | $3.00 / 1M train tokens | N/A |
| Serve Fine-Tuned Model | Serverless or dedicated | Dedicated GPU |
Fireworks runs managed supervised fine-tuning, DPO, and reinforcement fine-tuning for open models up to 1T+ parameters, priced per million training tokens. A LoRA SFT on a 16B to 80B model costs $3.00 per million training tokens. You can then serve the adapter on serverless or dedicated infrastructure.
DeepInfra does not run managed training. Its play is letting you deploy your own custom or fine-tuned model on dedicated GPUs at $0.89 to $2.79/hr. If you already have a trained checkpoint and want the cheapest place to serve it, DeepInfra fits. If you want the training and the serving in one platform, Fireworks does both.
Feature Surface: DeepInfra Hosts More Models
DeepInfra is broader on model count and modality. Fireworks is deeper on a curated, performance-tuned set.
| Feature | Fireworks AI | DeepInfra |
|---|---|---|
| Open Models Hosted | Curated set | 190+ models |
| OpenAI-Compatible API | Yes | Yes |
| Structured Outputs / JSON | Yes | Yes |
| Function / Tool Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Batch Inference API | Yes (50% off) | Limited |
| Embeddings | Yes | Yes (BGE, GTE, E5) |
| Image Generation | Yes | Yes (FLUX, dimensional pricing) |
| Speech / Video | Limited | Yes (TTS, ASR, video) |
| HF Inference Provider | No | Yes |
DeepInfra hosts 190+ open-source models spanning text, vision, OCR, embeddings, rerankers, image, video, and speech, and is a supported Hugging Face Inference Provider. Default serverless accounts cap at 200 concurrent requests, raisable from the dashboard.
Fireworks runs a smaller, curated catalog on its own engine, with structured outputs, tool calling, a batch inference API at 50% of serverless cost, and availability through AWS Marketplace. The trade is breadth versus a tuned, compliance-heavy stack.
Compliance & Enterprise: Fireworks Is Ahead
Fireworks has the more complete compliance story. This matters most in regulated industries.
Fireworks is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and markets a broader enterprise suite including GDPR and ISO. For healthcare, fintech, or any deployment that needs a signed BAA and audited controls, that is a hard requirement Fireworks meets out of the box.
DeepInfra positions itself as a low-cost, no-frills serverless host. It does not market the same depth of certifications, so for strict regulated workloads you will want to confirm its current attestations directly with their team before committing.
When to Use Fireworks AI
- Latency-sensitive production. FireAttention kernels plus FireOptimizer-tuned speculative decoding target the lowest tail latency, with up to 12x faster long-context inference reported.
- You need managed fine-tuning. LoRA SFT, DPO, and reinforcement fine-tuning for models up to 1T+ params, priced per million training tokens, then served on the same platform.
- Regulated industries. SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO coverage make Fireworks the safer pick for healthcare and finance.
- Bursty traffic. Per-second dedicated billing with scale-to-zero means you do not pay for idle GPUs between spikes.
- Offline batch jobs. The batch inference API runs at 50% of serverless pricing for large non-interactive workloads.
When to Use DeepInfra
- Cost is the constraint. Llama 70B at $0.40/M and a dedicated H100 at $1.79/hr undercut Fireworks by 2x to 4x.
- Serving your own fine-tuned model. Deploy a custom checkpoint on dedicated A100/H100/H200/B200 at $0.89 to $2.79/hr.
- You need many models or modalities. 190+ open models across text, vision, embeddings, rerank, image, video, and speech on one API.
- Hugging Face workflows. DeepInfra is a supported Hugging Face Inference Provider, so it slots into existing HF pipelines.
- High-volume embeddings. Embedding models at $0.005 to $0.01 per million tokens for large-scale indexing jobs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fireworks AI or DeepInfra cheaper?
DeepInfra is cheaper on both serverless tokens and dedicated GPUs. It serves Llama 3.1 70B at $0.40 per million tokens versus Fireworks at $0.90, and rents a dedicated H100 80GB at $1.79/hr versus Fireworks at $7.00/hr on-demand. Fireworks costs more because it bundles tuned latency, FireOptimizer, and a broader compliance suite.
What is FireAttention and does it make Fireworks faster?
FireAttention is Fireworks' custom CUDA inference engine with handwritten attention kernels and adaptive speculative decoding. Fireworks reports up to 12x faster long-context inference versus prior approaches and lower latency than self-hosted vLLM. DeepInfra runs optimized H100 and A100 clusters but does not market a custom kernel stack, so Fireworks generally wins on tuned tail latency while DeepInfra wins on price.
Can I run fine-tuned models on Fireworks AI and DeepInfra?
Yes. Fireworks offers managed fine-tuning (LoRA SFT, DPO, and reinforcement fine-tuning) for models up to 1T+ parameters, priced per million training tokens, and serves the result on serverless or dedicated infrastructure. DeepInfra supports deploying your own fine-tuned and custom models on dedicated GPUs billed per hour. Fireworks is the more complete self-serve training platform; DeepInfra is the cheaper place to serve a model you already have.
When does a dedicated GPU beat serverless on Fireworks or DeepInfra?
It depends on sustained volume. On DeepInfra, a dedicated H100 at $1.79/hr costs about $1,289/mo. At $0.40 per million output tokens, that equals roughly 3.2 billion tokens/mo, or about 1,240 sustained output tokens/sec, before dedicated is cheaper than serverless. On Fireworks the $7.00/hr H100 raises the break-even to roughly 2,160 sustained tokens/sec at $0.90/M. Below those rates, serverless wins because you only pay for tokens you generate; above them, a saturated dedicated GPU is cheaper.
Are Fireworks AI and DeepInfra OpenAI-compatible?
Yes. Both expose OpenAI-compatible chat completions, embeddings, streaming, structured outputs, and tool calling, so most clients work by swapping the base URL and API key. DeepInfra hosts 190+ open-source models across text, vision, embeddings, rerank, image, video, and speech, and is a Hugging Face Inference Provider. Fireworks hosts a curated set on its own performance engine and is also available through AWS Marketplace.
Related Comparisons
Cheap Open Models on DeepInfra, Tuned Stack on Fireworks
DeepInfra is the price floor; Fireworks is the premium tuned stack. If applying model-generated code edits is your bottleneck, that is a separate problem Morph Fast Apply solves at ~10,500 tok/s.