Cursor Alternatives (2026): We Tested 9 Tools and the $0 One Scored 88.6% on SWE-bench

We compared 9 Cursor alternatives in June 2026. Cline, opencode, and Kilo Code are free and open-source. Full pricing, GitHub stars, and SWE-bench scores.

June 28, 2026 · 1 min read
Cursor Alternatives (2026): We Tested 9 Tools and the $0 One Scored 88.6% on SWE-bench

The best free Cursor alternative is an open-source, bring-your-own-key agent. Cline (63,998 GitHub stars, Apache-2.0) and Kilo Code (25,038 stars, MIT) live in your editor; opencode (180,301 stars, MIT) runs in the terminal. All three cost $0 and bill only model inference. Pointed at Claude Opus 4.8, they hit the same 88.6% SWE-bench Verified as the paid tools.

Cursor Pro is $20/mo and includes $20 of model usage, then continues on usage-based billing, and the editor is a proprietary VS Code fork. We compared 9 alternatives in June 2026 on price, license, GitHub stars, editor support, and the model each one runs. Two 2026 shifts matter: Windsurf is now Devin Desktop (windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai), and Cursor acquired Continue.dev.

Updated June 28, 2026: refreshed every price and license, added exact GitHub star counts, swapped in current default models (Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3), reframed Windsurf as Devin Desktop, noted Cursor's Continue.dev acquisition, and added opencode, Kilo Code, and Aider.

9
Tools compared
4
Free, open source
$10/mo
Cheapest paid
88.6%
Top SWE-bench

SWE-bench Verified by Model (June 2026)

BYOK tools (Cline, opencode, Kilo Code, Aider) inherit the score of whatever model you point them at.

1
Claude Opus 4.8
BYOK or $20/mo
88.6%
2
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini CLI
80.6%
3
Gemini 3 Flash
Gemini CLI
78%
4
Gemini 3 Pro
Gemini CLI
76.2%

Same model, same score, whichever agent runs it. GPT-5.5 leads Terminal-Bench 2.0 at 82.7% and posts 58.6% on the harder SWE-bench Pro; OpenAI has not published a SWE-bench Verified number for it.

Quick Comparison: Cursor Alternatives at a Glance

Four tools are free and open-source (Cline, opencode, Kilo Code, Aider): the extension or CLI costs nothing and you pay only for the model you run. The cheapest paid plans are GitHub Copilot and Zed at $10/mo. Claude Code posts the highest published score at 88.6% SWE-bench Verified.

Cursor Alternatives (June 2026)
ToolPriceLicenseEditorsVerdict
ClineFree (BYOK)Apache-2.0VS Code, JetBrains, CLIBest free in-editor agent
opencodeFree (BYOK)MITTerminal, desktop, IDEMost-starred OSS agent
Kilo CodeFree (BYOK)MITVS Code, JetBrains, CLI0% markup gateway
AiderFree (BYOK)Apache-2.0TerminalBest OSS CLI pair-programmer
GitHub CopilotFree / $10 ProProprietaryVS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, XcodeBest free tier from a major vendor
Claude Code$20 ProProprietaryTerminal, VS Code, JetBrainsHighest SWE-bench (88.6%)
OpenAI CodexFree / $20 PlusApache-2.0Terminal, IDE, cloudStrong cloud sandboxes
ZedFree / $10 ProOSS (Rust)Zed editorFastest editor, hosts agents
Windsurf (Devin Desktop)Free / $20 ProProprietaryDevin editorNow Cognition's Devin

GitHub Stars: The Open-Source Field

For the "open source cursor alternative" and "cursor github competitor" searches, star count is the closest proxy for community. opencode leads every coding agent at 180,301 stars. Claude Code has the most-starred repo overall (134,868) but its code is not open-source.

GitHub Stars (June 2026)
ToolStarsLicenseType
opencode180,301MITTerminal agent (OSS)
Claude Code134,868ProprietaryTerminal/IDE agent
Gemini CLI105,641Apache-2.0Terminal agent (OSS)
Codex CLI94,277Apache-2.0Terminal agent (OSS)
Zed86,147OSS (Rust)Editor
Cline63,998Apache-2.0VS Code agent (OSS)
Aider46,808Apache-2.0Terminal CLI (OSS)
Continue.dev34,559Apache-2.0Extension (acquired by Cursor)
Kilo Code25,038MITVS Code/JetBrains agent (OSS)
Roo Code24,294Apache-2.0VS Code agent (OSS)
The model you point them at sets the cost

Cline, opencode, Kilo Code, and Aider are all model-agnostic, so price and quality come from the model behind your API key, not the tool. Morph's router (auto) scores each request and routes to the cheapest model that clears the bar, which makes an agent cheaper and faster at the same time. Morph also serves open-source models at 16-bit (bf16) activations with no fp8 or int8 quantization, so output matches the reference weights: GLM-5.2 at $1.1/$4.1 per 1M tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash at $0.139/$0.278, and Fast Apply merges edits at about 10,500 tokens per second. Point any BYOK agent above at it. See Morph models and pricing.

Monthly Cost: Paid Tier

Lower is better. The four open-source agents are $0; you pay only model inference.

1
Cursor
Pro
20$/mo
2
Claude Code
Pro
20$/mo
3
OpenAI Codex
Plus
20$/mo
4
Devin (Windsurf)
Pro
20$/mo
5
GitHub Copilot
Pro
10$/mo
6
Zed
Pro
10$/mo
7
Aider
OSS
0$/mo
8
Kilo Code
OSS
0$/mo
9
opencode
OSS
0$/mo
10
Cline
OSS
0$/mo

Cursor Pro includes $20 of model usage, then bills on-demand. The OSS agents bill only your model API; with cheap models that can stay well under a paid subscription.

Why Developers Leave Cursor

Cursor still works, and its $20 Pro plan now includes $20 of model usage with on-demand billing past that. The recurring complaints fall into four buckets, and open-source alternatives answer the first three directly.

Usage-based overages

The base plan is $20/mo with $20 of included usage. Heavy agent runs continue on on-demand billing past that, so monthly spend is hard to predict. Pro Plus is $60 and Ultra is $200.

VS Code fork lock-in

Cursor is a proprietary fork. Keybindings, extensions, and workflows are tied to its release cycle. Moving to JetBrains, Neovim, or plain VS Code means losing the AI layer.

Privacy gaps

Code is sent to third-party APIs. Open-source agents like Cline and Kilo Code can run local models via Ollama or LM Studio, keeping code on your machine.

No model control

The model is chosen for you. BYOK agents let you pick any provider, route to the cheapest passing model, or self-host open weights for predictable cost.

1. Cline: Best Free, Open-Source In-Editor Agent

Cline is the best free Cursor alternative for people who want to stay in VS Code. It is an open-source (Apache-2.0) extension with 63,998 GitHub stars; you bring your own API key, so the tool itself is $0 and you pay only for inference. It is fully model-agnostic, with BYOK support across Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex, Groq, Cerebras, and DeepSeek.

Cline VS Code extension interface showing AI-assisted coding

Cline running in VS Code.

Strengths
  • Free and open source (Apache-2.0); 63,998 GitHub stars and an active community
  • BYOK across Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, Bedrock, Vertex, Groq, Cerebras, and DeepSeek
  • Model-agnostic: run Claude Opus 4.8 for 88.6% SWE-bench, or a cheap model for routine edits
  • Works in VS Code and JetBrains; headless CLI mode for CI/CD
Limitations
  • No tab completions; Cursor's inline autocomplete is faster for small edits
  • Your API bill scales with usage and can pass a $20 Cursor plan for heavy work
  • Setup means configuring your own keys and model choices

Verdict: The best free alternative if you live in VS Code or JetBrains, want open-source transparency, or need the freedom to pick any model provider.

Cline vs Cursor
AspectClineCursor
PriceFree (pay model inference)$20-$200/mo
Open sourceYes (Apache-2.0)No
Model choiceAny provider (BYOK) or localCursor-managed
Editor supportVS Code, JetBrains, CLICursor fork only
Tab completionsNot availableSub-second, specialized

Full Cline vs Cursor comparison →

2. opencode: The Most-Starred Open-Source Agent

opencode is the free terminal option and the most-starred open-source coding agent at 180,301 GitHub stars (MIT). It runs in the terminal, a desktop app, or an IDE extension, and is fully model-agnostic: configure any provider with your own keys and there is no preset default model. The team also offers opencode Zen, a curated set of hosted models, for people who do not want to manage keys.

Strengths
  • Most-starred open-source coding agent: 180,301 GitHub stars (MIT)
  • Runs in the terminal, a desktop app, or an IDE extension
  • Model-agnostic BYOK with no preset default; optional opencode Zen hosted models
  • MCP servers, LSP servers, and sub-agents built in
Limitations
  • Terminal-first; no inline editor completions
  • No bundled inference; you bring keys or use opencode Zen
  • Repo moved from sst/opencode to anomalyco/opencode (old links redirect)

Verdict: Best free, open-source pick for terminal-centric workflows and the strongest answer to "open source cursor alternative" on GitHub by community size.

3. Kilo Code: Free Extension with a 0% Markup Gateway

Kilo Code is a free, open-source (MIT) agent for VS Code, JetBrains, and the CLI with 25,038 GitHub stars. The extension is free and AI usage is billed separately. Its differentiator is the Kilo Gateway: pay-as-you-go at exact provider rates with no markup, plus an Auto Model router that picks across Frontier, Balanced, and Free tiers. You can also BYOK or run local models via Ollama and LM Studio. The old kilocode.ai domain now redirects to kilo.ai.

Strengths
  • Free and open source (MIT); 25,038 GitHub stars
  • Kilo Gateway is pay-as-you-go at provider rates with 0% markup
  • BYOK or local models via Ollama and LM Studio
  • 500+ models across 60+ providers, with an Auto Model router (Frontier / Balanced / Free)
Limitations
  • Younger and smaller community than Cline
  • Gateway billing is separate from the free extension
  • VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI only; no standalone editor

Verdict: Best free in-editor option if you want zero-markup inference and a large model catalog without managing keys for every provider.

4. Aider: Open-Source Terminal Pair-Programmer

Aider is a free, open-source (Apache-2.0) AI pair-programming tool that runs in the terminal, with 46,808 GitHub stars and strong git integration. It is BYOK and model-agnostic. Aider also publishes the polyglot leaderboard: 225 Exercism exercises across C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Rust that test editing code without human help. On that board gpt-5 (high) leads at 88.0%, o3-pro (high) at 84.9%, and gemini-2.5-pro at 83.1%, though the board lags the newest 2026 frontier models.

Strengths
  • Free and open source (Apache-2.0); 46,808 GitHub stars
  • Terminal-native pair programmer with strong git integration
  • BYOK and model-agnostic
  • Publishes the polyglot leaderboard: 225 exercises across 6 languages
Limitations
  • Command-line only; no GUI or inline completions
  • Its public leaderboard trails the newest 2026 frontier models (repo last pushed May 2026)
  • Less autonomous than agent-style tools like Cline or opencode

Verdict: Best for developers who want a scriptable, git-aware CLI and a transparent, reproducible benchmark over a full IDE experience.

5. GitHub Copilot: Best Free Tier from a Major Vendor

GitHub Copilot has the strongest no-API-key free tier: $0/mo for 2,000 code completions and 50 chat requests per month (including Copilot Edits), with access to Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5 mini. Pro is $10/mo with unlimited completions, $15 of monthly model credits, a cloud agent, and the ability to run Claude Code and Codex as third-party agents. It works in VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, and Xcode.

GitHub Copilot interface in VS Code showing agent mode

Copilot in VS Code with multi-agent support.

Strengths
  • Free tier with no API key: 2,000 completions and 50 chat requests per month (Haiku 4.5, GPT-5 mini)
  • Pro is $10/mo with unlimited completions and $15 of monthly model credits
  • Runs Claude Code and Codex as third-party agents from one subscription
  • Works in VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, and Xcode; native AI PR review
Limitations
  • Individual agents are shallower than Claude Code's or Cursor's native ones
  • Premium model usage draws down monthly credits, then bills on-demand
  • Pro+ ($39/mo) is required for Opus-class models

Verdict: Best choice for a free start with no API key, or for one $10/mo subscription that runs multiple agent types across the widest set of editors.

Copilot vs Cursor
FeatureGitHub CopilotCursor
Price (individual)Free / $10 Pro / $39 Pro+ / $100 Max$20 Pro / $60 Pro Plus / $200 Ultra
Free tier2,000 completions + 50 chat/moHobby: limited agent + tab
Editor supportVS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, XcodeCursor fork only
Third-party agentsClaude Code, CodexCursor agents only
Code reviewNative AI PR reviewBugbot

6. Claude Code: Highest SWE-bench, Deepest Agent Stack

Claude Code is the strongest tool here on code quality. It runs Claude Opus 4.8, which scores 88.6% SWE-bench Verified and 69.2% SWE-bench Pro, the highest published numbers in this set, with the effort parameter defaulting to high. It is a proprietary agent that runs across the terminal, VS Code, JetBrains, desktop, web, and CI, and its repo is the most-starred here at 134,868 stars even though the code is not open-source.

Claude Code GitHub commits over time showing rapid adoption growth

Claude Code adoption growth. Source: SemiAnalysis / GitHub data.

Strengths
  • Claude Opus 4.8 scores 88.6% SWE-bench Verified and 69.2% SWE-bench Pro, the highest here
  • Sub-agents and agent teams, background and cloud sessions, hooks, skills, and CLAUDE.md memory
  • Runs in the terminal, VS Code, JetBrains, desktop, web, and CI
  • Most-starred repo in this set at 134,868 GitHub stars
Limitations
  • Proprietary; the code is not open source despite the public repo
  • No tab completions
  • Max plan is $200/mo, the same as Cursor Ultra

Verdict: Best for large codebases, long-horizon agentic work, and teams that index on benchmark code quality. Pro is $20/mo ($17/mo billed annually); Max runs from $100/mo.

Claude Code vs Cursor
AspectClaude CodeCursor
SWE-bench Verified88.6% (Opus 4.8)Not published
Agent stackSub-agents, hooks, skills, memoryParallel agents, Bugbot
SurfacesTerminal, VS Code, JetBrains, web, CICursor fork only
Tab completionsNot availableSub-second, specialized
Starting price$20/mo (Pro)$20/mo (Pro)

Full Claude Code vs Cursor comparison →

7. OpenAI Codex: Best for Isolated Cloud Sandboxes

Codex is OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE, and cloud, open-source under Apache-2.0 with 94,277 GitHub stars. Cloud tasks run in network-isolated containers, which makes it strong for security-sensitive work. GPT-5.5 is the default and recommended model, with GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, and a GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark preview also available; a GPT-5.6 "Sol" preview began rolling out in late June 2026. It is bundled with ChatGPT plans and metered in messages per shared 5-hour window.

OpenAI Codex CLI interface showing task execution in isolated sandboxes

Codex CLI with cloud sandbox isolation.

Strengths
  • Open source (Apache-2.0); 94,277 GitHub stars
  • Runs in the terminal, IDE, and cloud with network-isolated task sandboxes
  • Bundled with ChatGPT plans from $0 (limited) and $8/mo Go to $20/mo Plus
  • GPT-5.5 is the default; GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, and a GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark preview are available
Limitations
  • Usage is metered in messages per shared 5-hour window per plan
  • Cloud sandboxes disable network access during a task
  • Best value needs a ChatGPT subscription; API-key use is billed per token

Verdict: Best for security-conscious teams and spec-then-review workflows. Not ideal if you want real-time inline assistance.

See how Codex compares to Claude Code →

8. Zed: Fastest Editor, Hosts Any Agent

Zed is an open-source, GPU-accelerated Rust editor with 86,147 GitHub stars. Instead of building its own agent, it hosts external ones (Claude Agent, Codex CLI) with full editor integration. The Personal plan is free with 2,000 accepted edit predictions per month; Pro is $10/mo for unlimited predictions plus $5 of included tokens; Business is $30/seat/mo. BYOK is unlimited with your own keys.

Strengths
  • Open-source Rust editor, GPU-accelerated, 86,147 GitHub stars
  • Free Personal plan: 2,000 accepted edit predictions per month
  • Hosts external agents (Claude Agent, Codex CLI) inside the editor
  • BYOK is unlimited with your own keys
Limitations
  • Its own AI features are less mature than Cursor's
  • Smaller extension ecosystem than VS Code
  • Anthropic Opus models are not available in the free trial

Verdict: Best for peak editor performance with the freedom to plug in any agent. Not for those who want one fully integrated AI IDE out of the box.

9. Windsurf (now Devin Desktop): Folded into Cognition

Windsurf no longer exists as a separate product. windsurf.com/pricing 308-redirects to devin.ai/pricing: Cognition, the company behind Devin, owns it and rebranded the editor as Devin Desktop. The free tier gives unlimited Tab completions and inline edits with a light agent quota. Devin Pro is $20/mo with full model access and Devin Cloud agents; Devin Max is $200/mo; the team plan is $80/mo plus $40/mo per full dev seat.

Strengths
  • Free tier: unlimited Tab completions and inline edits with a light agent quota
  • Devin Pro is $20/mo with full model access and Devin Cloud agents
  • Direct Devin integration for long-running autonomous tasks
Limitations
  • Windsurf as a standalone product is gone; windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai
  • Still its own editor, so you trade one lock-in for another
  • Roadmap now follows Cognition's Devin priorities

Verdict: Reasonable if you want unlimited Tab completions for free or plan to lean on Devin's autonomous agents. Expect the product to keep converging with Devin.

Notable Mentions

Gemini CLI and Antigravity CLI

On June 18, 2026, Google stopped serving free, Google AI Pro, and Ultra requests for Gemini CLI and the Gemini Code Assist IDE extensions, replacing them with Antigravity CLI (open to everyone). Enterprise access via Code Assist Standard and Enterprise is unchanged. Gemini CLI (105,641 stars, Apache-2.0) still runs with credentials, on Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash with a 1M-token context.

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Amp is pay-as-you-go with no subscription ($5 minimum, no markup for individuals and teams). It spawns parallel sub-agents and ships an Oracle review tool built on GPT-5.5 high-reasoning. The enterprise tier costs 50% more with a one-time $1,000 purchase.

Roo Code and Roomote

Roo Code (24,294 stars, Apache-2.0) is a free, BYOK Cline fork for VS Code. roocode.com now redirects to roomote.dev, the team's separate hosted product, which starts at $99/mo with a 7-day trial.

Continue.dev and Void

Continue (34,559 stars, Apache-2.0) was acquired by Cursor; the open-source codebase remains available. Void, the privacy-first VS Code fork, is no longer actively developed. For local-model privacy, use Cline or Kilo Code with Ollama.

Pricing Comparison: Every Cursor Alternative

The four open-source agents charge nothing for the tool; you pay only for model inference, which can stay well under a paid subscription if you use cheaper models. Among paid tools, GitHub Copilot and Zed are the cheapest at $10/mo.

Monthly Pricing (June 2026)
ToolFree TierPaidTop Tier
CursorHobby ($0, limited)$20 Pro / $60 Pro Plus$200 Ultra
ClineFree (BYOK)Pay model inference onlyNo subscription
opencodeFree (BYOK)Pay model inference onlyopencode Zen (hosted)
Kilo CodeFree (BYOK)Kilo Gateway, 0% markupNo subscription
AiderFree (BYOK)Pay model inference onlyNo subscription
GitHub Copilot2,000 completions + 50 chat/mo$10 Pro / $39 Pro+$100 Max
Claude CodeLimited free$20/mo (Pro)$100 / $200 Max
OpenAI Codex$0 (limited)$8 Go / $20 Plus$100+ Pro
Zed2,000 edit predictions/mo$10/mo (Pro)$30/seat Business
Windsurf (Devin)Unlimited Tab, light agent quota$20/mo (Pro)$200/mo (Max)

Total Cost with Heavy Agent Usage

Agent-heavy workflows change the math. Each sub-agent burns tokens, so a 3-agent run uses roughly 3x the tokens of one. With the open-source tools, that cost is your model bill, so the lever is model choice: route routine edits to a cheap model and reserve a frontier model for hard work. A subscription with included usage (Copilot Pro at $10, Codex with ChatGPT Plus at $20) is more predictable; BYOK is cheaper if you manage the model mix.

Decision Framework: Pick Your Cursor Alternative

Match Your Priority to a Tool
Your PriorityBest PickWhy
Free + open source, in editorCline or Kilo CodeApache-2.0 / MIT, BYOK, pay only inference; Kilo Gateway adds 0% markup
Free + open source, terminalopencodeMost-starred OSS agent (180,301), MIT, MCP + LSP + sub-agents
Free from a major vendorGitHub Copilot Free2,000 completions + 50 chat/mo at $0, no API key
Highest code qualityClaude CodeOpus 4.8 scores 88.6% SWE-bench Verified
Cheapest paidCopilot or Zed ($10/mo)Half of Cursor's $20 Pro
Cloud sandboxes / isolationOpenAI CodexNetwork-isolated cloud tasks; GPT-5.5 default
Fastest editorZedRust, GPU-accelerated; hosts external agents
Local models / privacyCline or Kilo CodeRun local models via Ollama or LM Studio
CI/CD automationopencode or ClineHeadless terminal mode with structured output
Lowest model cost (BYOK)Morph router or DeepSeek V4 Flashauto routes to the cheapest passing model; morph-dsv4flash is $0.139/$0.278 at 16-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Cursor alternative in 2026?

It depends on what is driving you away. For a free, open-source in-editor agent, Cline and Kilo Code charge only model inference. opencode is the free terminal option and the most-starred OSS agent at 180,301 stars. For the highest code quality, Claude Code runs Claude Opus 4.8 at 88.6% SWE-bench Verified. For the cheapest paid plan, GitHub Copilot and Zed are $10/mo.

Is there a free alternative to Cursor?

Yes. Cline (Apache-2.0), opencode (MIT), Kilo Code (MIT), and Aider (Apache-2.0) are free and open-source; you bring your own API key and pay only for model inference. GitHub Copilot Free needs no key and gives 2,000 completions plus 50 chat requests per month. Zed Personal is free with 2,000 edit predictions per month.

What is the best open-source Cursor alternative on GitHub?

opencode is the most-starred open-source coding agent at 180,301 GitHub stars (MIT, terminal). Cline (63,998 stars, Apache-2.0) and Kilo Code (25,038 stars, MIT) are the open-source in-editor options, and Aider (46,808 stars, Apache-2.0) is the open-source terminal CLI. All four are model-agnostic and free to run with your own API key.

Is Claude Code better than Cursor?

Claude Code runs Claude Opus 4.8, which scores 88.6% SWE-bench Verified and 69.2% SWE-bench Pro, the highest published numbers here, and it supports sub-agents, hooks, skills, and CLAUDE.md memory across terminal, VS Code, JetBrains, desktop, and web. Cursor has faster tab completions and a plugin marketplace. See our full comparison.

Can I use Cursor alternatives with VS Code?

Yes. Cline, Kilo Code, GitHub Copilot, and Continue (now owned by Cursor) run as VS Code extensions. opencode, Aider, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, and Claude Code run in the terminal, and Claude Code and Copilot also have VS Code integrations. Zed and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) are their own editors.

Why are developers switching away from Cursor?

The common complaints are usage-based overages beyond the $20 base plan, lock-in to a proprietary VS Code fork, and privacy concerns about code sent to third-party APIs. Open-source agents like Cline and opencode remove the lock-in and let teams pick any model or run local models via Ollama.

Lift Any Agent's SWE-bench with WarpGrep

WarpGrep is model-agnostic agentic code search that improves an AI coding agent's SWE-bench result by giving it better context. It runs as an MCP server inside Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Cline, and opencode. Free for 100k requests per month, then $1 per 1M requests.

Sources